Penn State logo

Penn State

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.8%Penn State
95.2%Ohio State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOhio State -19.3
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINEOhio State -1983
Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePenn State 68
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreOhio State 87

Team Comparison

42.3MMH Power Index64.5
109.2Offensive Efficiency118.1
117.6Defensive Efficiency108.1
-8.4Net Efficiency10.0
5.3Strength of Schedule6.4
-20.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.3
67.5Tempo67.2
53.4%Effective FG%56.9%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.3%
25.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
34.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-5.7Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Ohio State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOhio State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–42.3), offensive efficiency (118.1–109.2), defensive efficiency (108.1–117.6), net efficiency (10.0–-8.4).
Final
Penn State logo
Penn State
78—84
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Ohio State by 6 • 68.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Penn StateTEAM STATOhio State
25-50FG30-54
50.0%FG%56.0%
10-253PT8-23
40.0%3PT%35.0%
18-21FT16-21
86.0%FT%76.0%
31Rebounds21
9Offensive Rebounds5
12Assists14
18Turnovers9
3Steals9
2Blocks2
19Fouls19

Player Box Score

Penn State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Eli RiceG347-146-110-020110020
Ivan JuricF375-91-33-6140000014
Josh ReedF384-70-05-550110013
Melih TuncaG184-81-44-421000013
Freddie Dilione VG132-40-24-42210008
Dominick StewartG202-32-30-02100006
Kayden MingoG331-40-22-21800004
Mason BlackwoodF40-00-00-01000000
Saša CianiF20-10-00-00000000
Justin HouserF10-00-00-00000000
Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John Mobley Jr.G387-145-116-625300025
Amare BynumF307-120-31-152300015
Devin RoyalF354-81-35-631000014
Taison ChatmanG174-61-32-221000011
Bruce ThorntonG374-61-20-12530009
Ivan NjegovanC203-40-02-43002008
Puff JohnsonG141-30-00-13000002
Colin WhiteF90-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.5Possessions68.5
113.9Offensive Efficiency122.6
122.6Defensive Efficiency113.9
-8.8Net Efficiency8.8
60.0%Effective FG%63.0%
65.0%True Shooting %65.7%
26.1%Turnover Rate13.2%
42.0%Free Throw Rate38.9%
50.0%3-Point Rate42.6%
0.67Assist / Turnover1.56
Game Summary
Ohio State won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 68.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.