
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.8%Arkansas-Pine Bluff
69.2%Grambling
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrambling -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -225

Grambling
14-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 72
Projected Total151.1
Projected ScoreGrambling 79
Team Comparison
38.7MMH Power Index41.4
106.4Offensive Efficiency100.7
111.6Defensive Efficiency100.4
-5.2Net Efficiency0.3
-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.7
1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4
72.6Tempo69.9
51.4%Effective FG%49.2%
18.5%Turnover Rate20.9%
29.3%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
37.7%Free Throw Rate42.2%
-3.8Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grambling HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–38.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–111.6), net efficiency (0.3–-5.2), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.0).
Arkansas-Pine Bluff COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.4–100.7), recent form (1.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (51.4–49.2).