
Mississippi Valley State
3-30GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.9%Mississippi Valley State
97.1%Southern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSouthern -24.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.0
MODEL MONEYLINESouthern -3348

Southern
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 66
Projected Total155.0
Projected ScoreSouthern 89
Team Comparison
17.7MMH Power Index44.5
91.1Offensive Efficiency108.7
117.8Defensive Efficiency106.4
-26.7Net Efficiency2.3
-4.1Strength of Schedule-7.5
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.0
70.5Tempo73.3
45.8%Effective FG%51.3%
21.8%Turnover Rate16.3%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %31.9%
34.5%Free Throw Rate40.3%
-18.8Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Southern HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY97.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouthern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.5–17.7), offensive efficiency (108.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (106.4–117.8), net efficiency (2.3–-26.7).
Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-7.5).