Buffalo logo

Buffalo

17-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Buffalo
74.4%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -9.2
PROJECTED TOTAL156.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -291
Bowling Green logo

Bowling Green

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBuffalo 74
Projected Total156.6
Projected ScoreBowling Green 83

Team Comparison

49.7MMH Power Index54.7
114.9Offensive Efficiency112.6
112.2Defensive Efficiency99.1
2.7Net Efficiency13.5
0.0Strength of Schedule-4.7
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
67.9Tempo72.2
56.1%Effective FG%53.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.9%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
40.4%Free Throw Rate38.7%
1.8Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (99.1–112.2), net efficiency (13.5–2.7), recent form (1.4–-5.9).
Buffalo COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.9–112.6), strength of schedule (0.0–-4.7), shooting efficiency (56.1–53.4).
Final
Buffalo logo
Buffalo
89—78
Bowling Green logo
Bowling Green
Buffalo by 11 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BuffaloTEAM STATBowling Green
29-52FG31-62
56.0%FG%50.0%
14-263PT7-20
54.0%3PT%35.0%
17-22FT9-15
77.0%FT%60.0%
30Rebounds32
6Offensive Rebounds11
16Assists14
9Turnovers10
5Steals4
2Blocks5
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Buffalo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan SabolG377-135-103-515000022
Angelo BrizziG313-62-46-633200014
Derrick Talton Jr.G244-72-33-422100013
Tim ObohC235-90-03-470120013
Daniel FreitagG294-92-52-234000012
Noah BatchelorG302-32-30-04210006
Ezra McKennaF142-21-10-05000005
Mikhail PocknettF122-30-00-12000004
Bowling Green
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Javontae CampbellG4013-202-33-637000031
Troy Glover IIF294-50-02-2101010010
Sam TownsF344-101-40-06113009
Josiah ShackelfordG244-81-10-05100009
Mayar WolF242-81-62-32210007
Javon RuffinG252-71-31-20011006
Justin ThomasG242-41-31-22210006

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8
133.2Offensive Efficiency116.8
116.8Defensive Efficiency133.2
16.5Net Efficiency-16.5
69.2%Effective FG%55.6%
71.3%True Shooting %56.4%
13.8%Turnover Rate14.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate24.2%
50.0%3-Point Rate32.3%
1.78Assist / Turnover1.40
Game Summary
Buffalo won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.