
Baylor
16-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.0%Baylor
69.0%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -5.8
PROJECTED TOTAL150.9
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -223

Cincinnati
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBaylor 73
Projected Total150.9
Projected ScoreCincinnati 78
Team Comparison
58.9MMH Power Index61.5
116.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
109.5Defensive Efficiency97.3
7.2Net Efficiency8.0
4.0Strength of Schedule5.1
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
69.7Tempo69.4
54.4%Effective FG%50.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate17.0%
37.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate30.7%
5.1Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–58.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–109.5), net efficiency (8.0–7.2), strength of schedule (5.1–4.0).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.7–105.3), shooting efficiency (54.4–50.6), ball security (16.4–17.0).