
Holy Cross
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.1%Holy Cross
84.9%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -11.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -562

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHoly Cross 68
Projected Total147.3
Projected ScoreColgate 79
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index48.8
103.3Offensive Efficiency111.7
110.9Defensive Efficiency109.0
-7.6Net Efficiency2.7
-2.6Strength of Schedule-2.0
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
66.1Tempo68.4
49.8%Effective FG%54.5%
15.4%Turnover Rate14.8%
22.4%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
32.5%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-5.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–37.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–103.3), defensive efficiency (109.0–110.9), net efficiency (2.7–-7.6).
Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (32.5–30.0).