Evansville logo

Evansville

7-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.4%Evansville
89.6%Drake
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrake -14.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEDrake -862
Drake logo

Drake

14-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEvansville 67
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreDrake 81

Team Comparison

31.6MMH Power Index46.4
98.5Offensive Efficiency109.5
112.4Defensive Efficiency109.1
-13.9Net Efficiency0.4
1.8Strength of Schedule0.3
-23.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.3
68.0Tempo68.6
50.0%Effective FG%52.2%
18.9%Turnover Rate14.9%
22.2%Offensive Rebound %27.2%
30.8%Free Throw Rate34.4%
-9.5Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Drake HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDrake holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.4–31.6), offensive efficiency (109.5–98.5), defensive efficiency (109.1–112.4), net efficiency (0.4–-13.9).
Evansville COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–0.3).
Final
Evansville logo
Evansville
78—82
Drake logo
Drake
Drake by 4 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

EvansvilleTEAM STATDrake
30-55FG22-51
55.0%FG%43.0%
11-223PT10-32
50.0%3PT%31.0%
7-12FT28-38
58.0%FT%74.0%
28Rebounds32
5Offensive Rebounds9
17Assists12
11Turnovers7
5Steals7
2Blocks3
25Fouls14

Player Box Score

Evansville
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Leif MoellerG408-163-61-277200020
Bryce QuinetG355-91-25-603010016
AJ CaseyF327-111-20-224100015
Joshua HughesF264-63-50-041110011
Alex HemenwayG343-83-70-03100009
Connor TurnbullF123-40-01-24100007
Kaia BerridgeG100-00-00-02010000
Trent HundleyF60-10-00-02000000
James Dyson-MerweF50-00-00-01000000
Drake
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen QuinnG377-152-610-1365200026
Andrew AliaG383-83-710-1093100019
Owen LarsonG345-133-100-002000013
Eli ShetlarG364-72-51-180100011
Okku FederikoF263-30-02-42123008
Isaiah CarrF90-00-02-42000002
Jaehshon ThomasG70-30-22-40010002
Griffen GoodbaryF70-00-01-20100001
Braden AppelhansG60-20-20-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
116.6Offensive Efficiency122.6
122.6Defensive Efficiency116.6
-6.0Net Efficiency6.0
64.5%Effective FG%52.9%
64.3%True Shooting %59.4%
16.5%Turnover Rate10.4%
21.8%Free Throw Rate74.5%
40.0%3-Point Rate62.7%
1.55Assist / Turnover1.71
Game Summary
Drake won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.