UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

91.9%UAB

8.1%UTSA

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -14.8

PROJECTED TOTAL154.0

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -1135

UTSA

5-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 84

Projected Total154.0

Projected ScoreUTSA 70

Team Comparison

UABMetricUTSA

56.9MMH Power Index30.5

110.5Offensive Efficiency99.0

102.9Defensive Efficiency115.0

7.6Net Efficiency-16.0

0.4Strength of Schedule-1.2

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

71.7Tempo70.2

48.8%Effective FG%45.9%

12.4%Turnover Rate17.0%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

36.9%Free Throw Rate29.9%

5.4Average Margin-11.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–30.5), offensive efficiency (110.5–99.0), defensive efficiency (102.9–115.0), net efficiency (7.6–-16.0).

Final

UAB

83—73

UTSA

UAB by 10 • 70.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATUTSA

28-57FG26-66

49.0%FG%39.0%

6-183PT7-25

33.0%3PT%28.0%

21-32FT14-17

66.0%FT%82.0%

41Rebounds35

10Offensive Rebounds11

14Assists9

7Turnovers9

8Steals4

5Blocks6

17Fouls23

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Daniel Rivera	F	27	7-13	1-1	2-5	7	0	1	1	17
Chance Westry	G	34	6-8	0-1	2-2	3	6	0	1	14
Jacob Meyer	G	31	4-9	1-4	4-4	6	2	2	1	13
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	20	4-8	0-0	2-5	9	0	0	0	10
Dayjaun Anderson	G	28	3-9	3-8	0-0	2	2	2	0	9
Evan Chatman	F	31	2-4	0-1	3-8	7	1	0	2	7
Ahmad Robinson	G	14	1-4	1-3	4-4	2	3	1	0	7
Salim London	G	15	1-2	0-0	4-4	3	0	2	0	6

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brent Moss	G	33	7-14	3-7	2-2	7	1	0	0	19
Jamir Simpson	G	38	8-14	2-6	0-0	3	1	0	0	18
Baboucarr Njie	F	27	5-14	0-1	3-3	7	0	1	3	13
Austin Nunez	G	34	1-13	1-6	4-4	3	3	1	0	7
Dorian Hayes	G	25	3-7	1-5	0-0	1	2	0	0	7
Kaidon Rayfield	F	13	0-2	0-0	4-4	3	1	0	1	4
Matheo Coffi	F	15	1-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	1	0	3
Mo Njie	C	13	1-1	0-0	0-2	4	1	0	2	2
LJ Brown	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.7Possessions70.7

117.4Offensive Efficiency103.3

103.3Defensive Efficiency117.4

14.1Net Efficiency-14.1

54.4%Effective FG%44.7%

57.5%True Shooting %49.3%

10.1%Turnover Rate12.5%

56.1%Free Throw Rate25.8%

31.6%3-Point Rate37.9%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

UAB won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 70.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.