
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.8%DePaul
70.2%Georgetown
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorgetown -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL134.8
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorgetown -236

Georgetown
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 65
Projected Total134.8
Projected ScoreGeorgetown 70
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index51.5
103.7Offensive Efficiency107.2
102.7Defensive Efficiency107.4
1.0Net Efficiency-0.2
2.0Strength of Schedule4.4
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8
67.7Tempo61.7
49.9%Effective FG%49.2%
17.8%Turnover Rate16.4%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
36.8%Free Throw Rate38.3%
0.7Average Margin-0.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Georgetown HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorgetown holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.5–48.4), offensive efficiency (107.2–103.7), strength of schedule (4.4–2.0), recent form (-4.8–-6.6).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–107.4), net efficiency (1.0–-0.2), shooting efficiency (49.9–49.2).