Stanford logo

Stanford

20-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.0%Stanford
77.0%Miami
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -9.5
PROJECTED TOTAL153.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -335
Miami logo

Miami

26-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStanford 72
Projected Total153.1
Projected ScoreMiami 81

Team Comparison

59.2MMH Power Index65.5
111.6Offensive Efficiency117.8
107.1Defensive Efficiency103.0
4.5Net Efficiency14.8
5.2Strength of Schedule3.6
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.6
68.1Tempo69.2
51.9%Effective FG%55.5%
15.5%Turnover Rate16.2%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
37.2%Free Throw Rate37.9%
3.0Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–59.2), offensive efficiency (117.8–111.6), defensive efficiency (103.0–107.1), net efficiency (14.8–4.5).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–3.6), recent form (7.4–3.6), ball security (15.5–16.2).
Final
Stanford logo
Stanford
70—79
Miami logo
Miami
Miami by 9 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StanfordTEAM STATMiami
27-62FG27-57
44.0%FG%47.0%
11-243PT6-15
46.0%3PT%40.0%
5-10FT19-31
50.0%FT%61.0%
30Rebounds39
13Offensive Rebounds15
16Assists15
14Turnovers9
6Steals8
1Blocks5
22Fouls13

Player Box Score

Stanford
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ebuka OkorieG338-211-52-354100019
Benny GealerG236-95-80-033100017
Ryan AgarwalG344-102-41-262100011
AJ RohosyF244-70-02-342000010
Aidan CammannF292-51-20-26320005
Jeremy Dent-SmithG242-71-30-02111005
Cameron GrantF221-31-20-01000003
Oskar GiltayF70-00-00-00100000
Donavin YoungF40-00-00-00000000
Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Malik ReneauF286-101-17-953000020
Tre DonaldsonG387-142-42-433110018
Shelton HendersonF344-110-34-973110012
Tru WashingtonG264-100-24-454300012
Dante AllenG253-71-32-21230009
Timotej MalovecF162-22-20-30000006
Ernest Udeh Jr.C281-20-00-09003002
Salih AltuntasF30-00-00-02000000
Noam DovratG20-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8
104.8Offensive Efficiency118.3
118.3Defensive Efficiency104.8
-13.5Net Efficiency13.5
52.4%Effective FG%52.6%
52.4%True Shooting %55.1%
20.7%Turnover Rate13.7%
16.1%Free Throw Rate54.4%
38.7%3-Point Rate26.3%
1.14Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Miami won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.