Bryant

9-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.1%Bryant

57.9%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -2.8

PROJECTED TOTAL136.5

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -138

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBryant 67

Projected Total136.5

Projected ScoreBinghamton 70

Team Comparison

BryantMetricBinghamton

34.1MMH Power Index32.4

98.6Offensive Efficiency102.2

110.2Defensive Efficiency112.3

-11.6Net Efficiency-10.1

-1.3Strength of Schedule-6.0

-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

65.8Tempo64.2

48.0%Effective FG%51.3%

20.0%Turnover Rate18.5%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

31.2%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-7.6Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–98.6), net efficiency (-10.1–-11.6), recent form (-6.2–-10.0), shooting efficiency (51.3–48.0).

Bryant COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (34.1–32.4), defensive efficiency (110.2–112.3), strength of schedule (-1.3–-6.0).

Final

Bryant

60—63

Binghamton

Binghamton by 3 • 59.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BryantTEAM STATBinghamton

20-54FG23-54

37.0%FG%43.0%

6-253PT5-13

24.0%3PT%38.0%

14-21FT12-17

67.0%FT%71.0%

35Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds9

8Assists13

5Turnovers6

3Steals3

6Blocks4

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Bryant

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keegan Harvey	F	31	8-12	3-4	7-7	7	0	1	2	26
Ashley Sims II	F	39	5-8	0-0	1-2	7	0	0	0	11
Aaron Davis III	F	28	3-8	2-5	3-6	3	0	1	0	11
Timofei Rudovskii	F	38	2-11	1-7	3-5	7	1	1	4	8
Ty Tabales	G	31	1-8	0-5	0-1	4	6	0	0	2
Gio Sanford	F	15	1-6	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Daniel Akoue	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Khalil Williams	F	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jakai Robinson	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremiah Quigley	G	38	7-15	1-2	6-6	5	8	0	0	21
Bryson Wilson	G	32	4-10	1-4	5-6	6	0	1	1	14
Zyier Beverly	F	24	4-9	0-0	1-4	6	1	0	1	9
Jackson Benigni	G	31	2-4	2-4	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Ryan Richardson	G	38	2-5	1-3	0-1	2	3	0	1	5
Stephan Snagg	F	21	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	4
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	16	2-6	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	4

Advanced Game Stats

59.1Possessions59.1

101.5Offensive Efficiency106.6

106.6Defensive Efficiency101.5

-5.1Net Efficiency5.1

42.6%Effective FG%47.2%

46.9%True Shooting %50.7%

8.5%Turnover Rate10.2%

38.9%Free Throw Rate31.5%

46.3%3-Point Rate24.1%

1.60Assist / Turnover2.17

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 59.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.