
Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.6%Fairleigh Dickinson
61.4%Stonehill
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStonehill -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL134.9
MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -159

Stonehill
12-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 65
Projected Total134.9
Projected ScoreStonehill 70
Team Comparison
38.3MMH Power Index37.9
103.8Offensive Efficiency97.5
108.4Defensive Efficiency100.7
-4.6Net Efficiency-3.2
-5.8Strength of Schedule-5.4
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4
64.7Tempo68.1
48.6%Effective FG%48.0%
18.2%Turnover Rate19.1%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %28.4%
33.1%Free Throw Rate29.2%
-3.0Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairleigh Dickinson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairleigh Dickinson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.3–37.9), offensive efficiency (103.8–97.5), shooting efficiency (48.6–48.0), ball security (18.2–19.1).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–108.4), net efficiency (-3.2–-4.6), strength of schedule (-5.4–-5.8).