
Charleston
21-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.6%Charleston
75.4%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -307

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 69
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreHofstra 78
Team Comparison
53.8MMH Power Index59.3
109.2Offensive Efficiency114.0
106.2Defensive Efficiency100.9
3.0Net Efficiency13.1
1.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
69.1Tempo66.2
50.6%Effective FG%52.2%
15.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.1%Free Throw Rate32.0%
2.0Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–109.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.2), net efficiency (13.1–3.0).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-2.9), ball security (15.4–16.1), free throw rate (42.1–32.0).