Utah Valley

25-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

75.1%Utah Valley

24.9%Tarleton State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -6.4

PROJECTED TOTAL149.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -302

Tarleton State

14-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 78

Projected Total149.9

Projected ScoreTarleton State 72

Team Comparison

Utah ValleyMetricTarleton State

59.1MMH Power Index44.6

113.4Offensive Efficiency103.2

97.3Defensive Efficiency101.6

16.1Net Efficiency1.6

-3.3Strength of Schedule-2.3

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7

70.6Tempo72.2

56.0%Effective FG%49.0%

19.9%Turnover Rate19.9%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %31.8%

37.3%Free Throw Rate42.8%

11.4Average Margin1.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–44.6), offensive efficiency (113.4–103.2), defensive efficiency (97.3–101.6), net efficiency (16.1–1.6).

Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.3–-3.3), free throw rate (42.8–37.3).

Final

Utah Valley

83—55

Tarleton State

Utah Valley by 28 • 72.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah ValleyTEAM STATTarleton State

30-54FG15-53

56.0%FG%28.0%

8-163PT5-14

50.0%3PT%36.0%

15-16FT20-29

94.0%FT%69.0%

38Rebounds26

10Offensive Rebounds13

18Assists7

20Turnovers19

12Steals13

8Blocks3

22Fouls15

Player Box Score

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trevan Leonhardt	G	30	9-13	2-3	0-0	5	3	3	1	20
Isaac Davis	F	20	7-7	1-1	2-2	2	1	1	0	17
Isaac Hawkins	F	17	3-6	0-0	4-4	7	1	0	4	10
Noah Taitz	G	18	2-5	2-4	3-4	1	1	1	0	9
Tyler Hendricks	G	30	2-6	1-3	2-2	2	2	2	1	7
Hayden Welling	F	15	2-4	0-0	2-2	2	1	0	1	6
Braden Housley	G	24	2-3	1-2	0-0	5	4	3	0	5
Tyler Weaver	F	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jackson Holcombe	G	28	1-5	0-0	0-0	8	3	1	0	2
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	G	9	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	1	2
Tyler Medaris	F	3	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	1	0	0	2
AJ Riggs	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Tarleton State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kaia Isaac	G	29	4-10	2-5	3-3	2	1	0	0	13
Cam McDowell	G	34	3-9	2-3	4-6	3	1	2	0	12
Ocypher Owens	F	28	1-9	0-2	5-5	6	1	3	1	7
Damion Porter Jr.	G	8	2-3	1-2	2-3	2	0	0	0	7
Chris Mpaka	F	17	2-4	0-0	2-2	5	0	1	2	6
Andy Sigiscar	F	12	1-2	0-0	3-7	1	0	0	0	5
DJ Dormu	G	22	2-10	0-2	0-1	0	2	2	0	4
Matyas Vrabel	F	8	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Jordan Mizell	G	29	0-4	0-0	0-0	3	2	3	0	0
Kade Douglas	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cameron Thomas	G	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Joseph Martinez	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.2Possessions72.2

115.0Offensive Efficiency76.2

76.2Defensive Efficiency115.0

38.8Net Efficiency-38.8

63.0%Effective FG%33.0%

67.4%True Shooting %41.2%

27.9%Turnover Rate26.1%

29.6%Free Throw Rate54.7%

29.6%3-Point Rate26.4%

0.90Assist / Turnover0.37

Game Summary

Utah Valley won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 72.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.