
Cleveland State
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.8%Cleveland State
88.2%Green Bay
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGreen Bay -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL161.6
MODEL MONEYLINEGreen Bay -747

Green Bay
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCleveland State 74
Projected Total161.6
Projected ScoreGreen Bay 87
Team Comparison
37.3MMH Power Index50.8
111.6Offensive Efficiency114.0
120.2Defensive Efficiency114.0
-8.6Net Efficiency0.0
-1.7Strength of Schedule0.7
-14.6Last 10 Net Efficiency5.1
71.5Tempo65.7
55.0%Effective FG%55.4%
18.0%Turnover Rate15.9%
28.6%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
38.7%Free Throw Rate42.4%
-6.2Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Green Bay HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGreen Bay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.8–37.3), offensive efficiency (114.0–111.6), defensive efficiency (114.0–120.2), net efficiency (0.0–-8.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (28.6–25.6).