Harvard

17-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.2%Harvard

28.8%Brown

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -3.5

PROJECTED TOTAL137.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -247

Brown

9-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHarvard 71

Projected Total137.9

Projected ScoreBrown 67

Team Comparison

HarvardMetricBrown

52.6MMH Power Index39.9

108.1Offensive Efficiency102.7

102.9Defensive Efficiency102.3

5.2Net Efficiency0.4

-0.1Strength of Schedule-4.9

8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.1

64.8Tempo68.5

53.4%Effective FG%50.4%

17.2%Turnover Rate18.8%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %30.0%

27.9%Free Throw Rate28.2%

3.4Average Margin0.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–39.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–102.7), net efficiency (5.2–0.4), strength of schedule (-0.1–-4.9).

Brown COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.3–102.9), offensive rebounding (30.0–26.3), free throw rate (28.2–27.9).

Final

Harvard

69—59

Brown

Harvard by 10 • 61.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATBrown

18-35FG23-53

51.0%FG%43.0%

6-173PT4-20

35.0%3PT%20.0%

27-29FT9-17

93.0%FT%53.0%

26Rebounds27

2Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists17

14Turnovers10

7Steals7

5Blocks2

15Fouls22

Player Box Score

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	37	4-8	0-1	14-16	4	4	2	0	22
Tey Barbour	G	37	5-7	4-6	6-6	7	0	1	0	20
Chandler Pigge	G	33	6-12	2-6	2-2	3	1	1	1	16
Ben Eisendrath	G	19	2-3	0-1	1-1	1	0	1	0	5
Thomas Batties III	F	31	0-4	0-3	4-4	6	0	0	3	4
Frankie Mannino	G	18	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	2	2	0	2
Ryan Sullivan	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	0
Xavier Nesbitt	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Kenan Parrish	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Brown

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Landon Lewis	F	35	12-16	0-1	6-10	8	2	0	0	30
Jeremiah Jenkins	G	28	2-4	2-2	2-4	0	5	2	0	8
Adrian Uchidiuno	G	29	3-13	1-10	0-0	2	1	2	0	7
N'famara Dabo	F	25	3-4	0-0	0-0	2	1	2	1	6
Isaiah Langham	G	25	2-8	0-3	1-2	1	4	1	0	5
Luke Paragon	G	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
David Rochester	F	27	0-3	0-0	0-1	3	3	0	1	0
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	G	15	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.0Possessions61.0

113.1Offensive Efficiency96.7

96.7Defensive Efficiency113.1

16.4Net Efficiency-16.4

60.0%Effective FG%47.2%

70.7%True Shooting %48.3%

23.0%Turnover Rate16.4%

82.9%Free Throw Rate32.1%

48.6%3-Point Rate37.7%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.70

Game Summary

Harvard won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 61.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.