
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Pennsylvania
59.8%Columbia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -149

Columbia
16-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 73
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreColumbia 78
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index51.9
108.6Offensive Efficiency112.4
106.4Defensive Efficiency105.2
2.2Net Efficiency7.2
1.9Strength of Schedule-1.7
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.4
69.9Tempo68.2
50.9%Effective FG%54.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate19.1%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
36.3%Free Throw Rate28.8%
1.5Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.4–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.4), net efficiency (7.2–2.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–50.9).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.9–51.9), strength of schedule (1.9–-1.7), recent form (2.3–-2.4).