Pittsburgh

13-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.4%Pittsburgh

82.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -11.2

PROJECTED TOTAL138.5

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -475

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePittsburgh 64

Projected Total138.5

Projected ScoreClemson 75

Team Comparison

PittsburghMetricClemson

50.5MMH Power Index59.9

108.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

110.4Defensive Efficiency101.4

-2.0Net Efficiency11.2

5.5Strength of Schedule4.6

-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

65.0Tempo63.6

51.4%Effective FG%53.0%

17.3%Turnover Rate14.0%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

31.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-1.3Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–110.4), net efficiency (11.2–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), offensive rebounding (33.1–27.0).

Final

Pittsburgh

52—63

Clemson

Clemson by 11 • 56.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATClemson

20-53FG19-41

38.0%FG%46.0%

5-263PT8-21

19.0%3PT%38.0%

7-11FT17-20

64.0%FT%85.0%

33Rebounds25

16Offensive Rebounds5

9Assists12

14Turnovers11

6Steals8

4Blocks2

20Fouls16

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Damarco Minor	G	37	4-10	4-10	0-0	6	2	1	1	12
Roman Siulepa	F	25	5-7	1-3	1-1	9	1	2	1	12
Cameron Corhen	F	23	3-8	0-2	3-5	3	1	0	0	9
Omari Witherspoon	G	37	3-9	0-4	2-2	4	1	0	2	8
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	37	2-7	0-3	1-2	6	2	2	0	5
Kieran Mullen	C	7	2-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Brandin Cummings	G	12	1-3	0-1	0-1	1	0	0	0	2
Nojus Indrusaitis	G	17	0-7	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Macari Moore	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nick Davidson	F	24	5-8	2-4	0-0	2	1	0	0	12
Carter Welling	F	18	3-7	0-2	6-6	1	0	1	0	12
RJ Godfrey	F	24	3-5	0-0	4-6	3	0	0	0	10
Butta Johnson	G	20	2-4	2-3	2-2	2	1	2	0	8
Jestin Porter	G	32	2-6	1-3	0-0	2	2	0	1	5
Dillon Hunter	G	30	2-7	1-5	0-0	6	3	1	1	5
Jake Wahlin	F	17	1-2	1-2	2-2	2	1	2	0	5
Ace Buckner	G	28	1-2	1-2	1-2	2	4	1	0	4
Chase Thompson	F	7	0-0	0-0	2-2	2	0	1	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

56.4Possessions56.4

92.2Offensive Efficiency111.7

111.7Defensive Efficiency92.2

-19.5Net Efficiency19.5

42.5%Effective FG%56.1%

44.7%True Shooting %62.4%

24.9%Turnover Rate19.5%

20.8%Free Throw Rate48.8%

49.1%3-Point Rate51.2%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Clemson won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 56.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.