Boston University

16-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

75.4%Boston University

24.6%Bucknell

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBoston University -5.7

PROJECTED TOTAL147.8

MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -307

Bucknell

10-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBoston University 77

Projected Total147.8

Projected ScoreBucknell 71

Team Comparison

Boston UniversityMetricBucknell

50.3MMH Power Index35.7

115.3Offensive Efficiency99.5

113.1Defensive Efficiency112.8

2.2Net Efficiency-13.3

-2.7Strength of Schedule2.0

11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5

65.4Tempo67.7

58.6%Effective FG%48.4%

17.7%Turnover Rate19.0%

27.4%Offensive Rebound %26.6%

32.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%

1.5Average Margin-8.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Boston University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–35.7), offensive efficiency (115.3–99.5), net efficiency (2.2–-13.3), recent form (11.2–-11.5).

Bucknell COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.8–113.1), strength of schedule (2.0–-2.7).

Final

Boston University

97—97

Bucknell

Tied • 76.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boston UniversityTEAM STATBucknell

31-68FG31-68

46.0%FG%46.0%

11-313PT11-31

35.0%3PT%35.0%

24-29FT24-29

83.0%FT%83.0%

35Rebounds35

12Offensive Rebounds12

17Assists17

7Turnovers7

6Steals6

4Blocks4

22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Boston University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Gladden	G	48	8-14	1-2	17-18	4	4	1	0	34
Sam Hughes	F	48	7-13	5-10	3-3	3	0	0	0	22
Michael McNair	G	49	8-16	3-9	0-0	6	3	0	0	19
Ben Defty	F	34	4-7	0-0	2-4	10	5	1	3	10
Azmar Abdullah	G	37	3-13	2-7	1-2	2	1	3	0	9
Donte Tisinger Jr.	G	23	1-4	0-3	0-0	3	4	1	1	2
Quinn Nielsen	F	11	0-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	0	1

Bucknell

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Gladden	G	48	8-14	1-2	17-18	4	4	1	0	34
Sam Hughes	F	48	7-13	5-10	3-3	3	0	0	0	22
Michael McNair	G	49	8-16	3-9	0-0	6	3	0	0	19
Ben Defty	F	34	4-7	0-0	2-4	10	5	1	3	10
Azmar Abdullah	G	37	3-13	2-7	1-2	2	1	3	0	9
Donte Tisinger Jr.	G	23	1-4	0-3	0-0	3	4	1	1	2
Quinn Nielsen	F	11	0-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

76.8Possessions76.8

126.3Offensive Efficiency126.3

126.3Defensive Efficiency126.3

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

53.7%Effective FG%53.7%

59.3%True Shooting %59.3%

9.1%Turnover Rate9.1%

42.6%Free Throw Rate42.6%

45.6%3-Point Rate45.6%

2.43Assist / Turnover2.43

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 76.8 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.