
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.2%Queens University
43.8%Bellarmine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -0.6
PROJECTED TOTAL170.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -128

Bellarmine
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 86
Projected Total170.6
Projected ScoreBellarmine 85
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index44.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency119.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency122.1
1.4Net Efficiency-2.5
0.1Strength of Schedule-2.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3
71.4Tempo66.9
56.6%Effective FG%60.0%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %22.7%
37.6%Free Throw Rate35.3%
0.9Average Margin-1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–44.9), defensive efficiency (117.0–122.1), net efficiency (1.4–-2.5), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.8).
Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (119.6–118.4), shooting efficiency (60.0–56.6).