Loyola Maryland logo

Loyola Maryland

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.2%Loyola Maryland
90.8%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -15.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.4
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -987
Navy logo

Navy

26-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 65
Projected Total146.4
Projected ScoreNavy 81

Team Comparison

40.8MMH Power Index56.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency113.2
110.7Defensive Efficiency97.6
-2.6Net Efficiency15.6
-5.0Strength of Schedule-8.1
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
69.6Tempo65.9
51.2%Effective FG%53.7%
15.7%Turnover Rate17.1%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
31.0%Free Throw Rate40.9%
-1.8Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–40.8), offensive efficiency (113.2–108.1), defensive efficiency (97.6–110.7), net efficiency (15.6–-2.6).
Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-5.0–-8.1), ball security (15.7–17.1).
Final
Loyola Maryland logo
Loyola Maryland
7187
Navy logo
Navy
Navy by 1665.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Loyola MarylandTEAM STATNavy
25-62FG38-58
40.0%FG%66.0%
12-303PT6-15
40.0%3PT%40.0%
9-10FT5-10
90.0%FT%50.0%
24Rebounds36
12Offensive Rebounds10
11Assists27
12Turnovers11
5Steals8
2Blocks3
13Fouls11

Player Box Score

Loyola Maryland
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Emmett AdairF3110-216-112-272000028
Braeden SpeedG369-163-73-414100024
Jordan StiemkeG272-51-40-03110005
Tyson CommanderG261-11-12-21112005
Carter Berg-McLeanG282-80-20-02300004
Sebastien EmenaloG181-31-20-02000003
Sam SpringerF200-50-12-22000002
Troy Cicero Jr.G80-30-20-01020000
Everett BarnesF60-00-00-00000000
Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Aidan KehoeC2911-110-01-273210023
Jordan PennickG326-91-32-235100015
Donovan DraperF317-110-10-063510014
Jinwoo KimG305-102-30-243000012
Austin BenigniG354-81-32-245000011
Cam ColeG234-82-50-043010010
Mike WoodsF201-10-00-24500002

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3
108.7Offensive Efficiency133.2
133.2Defensive Efficiency108.7
-24.5Net Efficiency24.5
50.0%Effective FG%70.7%
53.2%True Shooting %69.3%
18.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
16.1%Free Throw Rate17.2%
48.4%3-Point Rate25.9%
0.92Assist / Turnover2.45
Game Summary
Navy won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.