UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

67.7%UT Rio Grande Valley

32.3%Incarnate Word

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.6

PROJECTED TOTAL147.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -210

Incarnate Word

12-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76

Projected Total147.9

Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 72

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricIncarnate Word

55.8MMH Power Index44.6

112.6Offensive Efficiency112.0

103.1Defensive Efficiency111.2

9.5Net Efficiency0.8

-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.6

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5

67.4Tempo66.3

55.7%Effective FG%52.2%

17.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %34.4%

29.6%Free Throw Rate34.0%

6.4Average Margin0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–112.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–111.2), net efficiency (9.5–0.8).

Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.9), offensive rebounding (34.4–29.2), free throw rate (34.0–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

106—93

Incarnate Word

UT Rio Grande Valley by 13 • 72.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATIncarnate Word

38-61FG33-59

62.0%FG%56.0%

12-253PT10-22

48.0%3PT%45.0%

18-22FT17-22

82.0%FT%77.0%

23Rebounds31

6Offensive Rebounds11

17Assists14

6Turnovers14

7Steals1

3Blocks3

17Fouls20

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Koree Cotton	G	30	8-9	2-2	3-3	1	5	1	0	21
Julien Gomez	G	28	7-11	4-5	2-3	1	3	3	0	20
Jaylen Washington	G	35	7-12	1-4	4-4	2	6	1	0	19
Filip Brankovic	F	20	4-7	1-3	6-7	5	0	1	1	15
Marvin McGhee III	G	31	4-4	2-2	2-2	2	0	0	0	12
Zae Blake	G	8	2-4	2-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Kwo Agwa	F	7	1-3	0-0	1-3	1	0	1	1	3
Marshal Destremau	F	13	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Demarris Winters	G	10	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Always Wright	G	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Jalen Ricks	G	7	1-2	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Dane Christensen	F	4	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Incarnate Word

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Pyke	F	33	11-16	3-5	8-10	7	1	0	0	33
Tahj Staveskie	G	38	10-17	3-7	1-2	0	7	0	0	24
Davion Bailey	G	34	5-11	2-4	2-2	2	1	1	0	14
Harold Woods	G	26	3-7	0-1	6-8	12	2	0	2	12
Harrison Reede	G	19	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Marcus Glover	F	25	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Amani Drummond	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jayden Williams	C	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Love Bettis	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Lewis Rowe	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Mihael Tomic	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Esteban Mann	F	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.0Possessions72.0

147.2Offensive Efficiency129.2

129.2Defensive Efficiency147.2

18.1Net Efficiency-18.1

72.1%Effective FG%64.4%

74.2%True Shooting %67.0%

8.4%Turnover Rate19.3%

36.1%Free Throw Rate37.3%

41.0%3-Point Rate37.3%

2.83Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 72.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.