Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.6%Harvard
87.4%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -12.5
PROJECTED TOTAL141.6
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -694
Yale logo

Yale

23-7
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 65
Projected Total141.6
Projected ScoreYale 77

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index65.4
108.1Offensive Efficiency121.4
102.9Defensive Efficiency105.8
5.2Net Efficiency15.6
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.6
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
64.8Tempo64.5
53.4%Effective FG%56.8%
17.2%Turnover Rate13.9%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
27.9%Free Throw Rate34.4%
3.4Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–52.6), offensive efficiency (121.4–108.1), net efficiency (15.6–5.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-0.1).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–105.8).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
6765
Yale logo
Yale
Harvard by 257.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATYale
22-47FG24-56
47.0%FG%43.0%
8-173PT8-20
47.0%3PT%40.0%
15-18FT9-11
83.0%FT%82.0%
30Rebounds29
6Offensive Rebounds9
13Assists14
8Turnovers6
3Steals4
5Blocks2
13Fouls12

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Robert HintonG399-162-26-723000026
Chandler PiggeG294-50-04-442100012
Thomas Batties IIIF404-132-60-053130010
Kenan ParrishF143-62-32-220000010
Tey BarbourG372-52-53-58310009
Ben EisendrathG270-20-10-02202000
Frankie ManninoG110-00-00-01000000
Xavier NesbittG30-00-00-00000000
Yale
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trevor MullinG338-135-80-032000021
Nick TownsendF356-131-35-564100018
Samson AletanC283-70-02-28110008
Casey SimmonsG274-40-00-00202008
Jordan BrathwaiteG192-72-40-01300006
Riley FoxF171-40-22-44000004
Isaac CeliscarF320-40-20-06210000
Devon ArlingtonG70-30-00-01000000
Jack SullivanF20-10-10-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

57.9Possessions57.9
115.7Offensive Efficiency112.3
112.3Defensive Efficiency115.7
3.5Net Efficiency-3.5
55.3%Effective FG%50.0%
60.3%True Shooting %53.1%
13.9%Turnover Rate10.3%
38.3%Free Throw Rate19.6%
36.2%3-Point Rate35.7%
1.63Assist / Turnover2.33
Game Summary
Harvard won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 57.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.