
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.4%UAB
49.6%North Texas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNorth Texas -1.0
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -102

North Texas
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 73
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreNorth Texas 74
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index52.2
110.5Offensive Efficiency104.1
102.9Defensive Efficiency99.1
7.6Net Efficiency5.0
0.4Strength of Schedule-1.3
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency4.8
71.7Tempo68.1
48.8%Effective FG%47.6%
12.4%Turnover Rate16.7%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
36.9%Free Throw Rate41.1%
5.4Average Margin3.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.1), net efficiency (7.6–5.0), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.3).
North Texas COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.1–102.9), recent form (4.8–2.9), offensive rebounding (33.6–32.7).