
Cal Poly
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.0%Cal Poly
48.0%UC Riverside
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Riverside -0.8
PROJECTED TOTAL163.0
MODEL MONEYLINECal Poly -108

UC Riverside
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCal Poly 81
Projected Total163.0
Projected ScoreUC Riverside 82
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index41.2
107.2Offensive Efficiency103.1
111.0Defensive Efficiency110.1
-3.8Net Efficiency-7.0
1.7Strength of Schedule0.5
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1
76.6Tempo70.7
52.2%Effective FG%49.8%
19.8%Turnover Rate18.5%
29.9%Offensive Rebound %28.5%
35.8%Free Throw Rate35.2%
-2.9Average Margin-4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cal Poly HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCal Poly holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.5–41.2), offensive efficiency (107.2–103.1), net efficiency (-3.8–-7.0), strength of schedule (1.7–0.5).
UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.1–111.0), ball security (18.5–19.8).