Delaware

10-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

26.3%Delaware

73.7%UTEP

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUTEP -7.4

PROJECTED TOTAL141.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUTEP -280

UTEP

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDelaware 67

Projected Total141.7

Projected ScoreUTEP 75

Team Comparison

DelawareMetricUTEP

39.7MMH Power Index44.4

103.3Offensive Efficiency102.6

112.9Defensive Efficiency107.1

-9.6Net Efficiency-4.5

3.4Strength of Schedule1.7

-9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

65.5Tempo67.6

52.9%Effective FG%49.2%

18.4%Turnover Rate17.3%

20.5%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

31.2%Free Throw Rate35.6%

-6.3Average Margin-3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UTEP HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUTEP holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–39.7), defensive efficiency (107.1–112.9), net efficiency (-4.5–-9.6), recent form (-4.7–-9.8).

Delaware COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.3–102.6), strength of schedule (3.4–1.7), shooting efficiency (52.9–49.2).

Final

Delaware

55—70

UTEP

UTEP by 15 • 62.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DelawareTEAM STATUTEP

13-49FG22-57

27.0%FG%39.0%

2-233PT6-16

9.0%3PT%38.0%

27-29FT20-25

93.0%FT%80.0%

38Rebounds35

14Offensive Rebounds13

7Assists13

14Turnovers6

5Steals12

—Blocks1

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Delaware

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Christian Bliss	G	40	3-10	0-2	11-11	6	3	3	17
Tyler Houser	F	37	4-12	0-5	7-8	9	2	1	15
Justyn Fernandez	G	35	1-11	0-7	7-8	7	0	1	9
Jayden Taylor	F	18	2-3	1-1	0-0	4	0	0	5
Macon Emory	F	38	1-9	0-6	2-2	7	2	0	4
Alex Kazanecki	G	29	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	3
Houston Emory	F	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2

UTEP

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamal West Jr.	F	29	5-9	0-0	5-6	6	1	1	1	15
Elijah Jones	F	29	7-17	0-3	1-3	12	1	1	0	15
Kaseem Watson	F	36	4-10	2-5	0-0	4	3	2	0	10
Caleb Blackwell	G	33	2-8	2-5	4-4	6	2	3	0	10
LA Hayes	G	15	3-7	1-1	0-0	3	3	1	0	7
KJ Thomas	G	33	0-2	0-0	5-6	1	2	2	0	5
Trey Horton III	G	17	1-3	1-2	2-2	2	1	0	0	5
Cassius Brooks	G	8	0-1	0-0	3-4	0	0	2	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

62.4Possessions62.4

88.1Offensive Efficiency112.2

112.2Defensive Efficiency88.1

-24.0Net Efficiency24.0

28.6%Effective FG%43.9%

43.8%True Shooting %50.8%

22.3%Turnover Rate9.7%

59.2%Free Throw Rate43.9%

46.9%3-Point Rate28.1%

0.50Assist / Turnover2.17

Game Summary

UTEP won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 62.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.