
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Quinnipiac
60.1%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -151

Fairfield
21-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreFairfield 76
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index50.1
106.8Offensive Efficiency109.6
102.1Defensive Efficiency105.4
4.7Net Efficiency4.2
-2.3Strength of Schedule-3.4
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
70.5Tempo67.8
48.9%Effective FG%49.1%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.0%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate28.4%
3.4Average Margin2.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–50.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–105.4), net efficiency (4.7–4.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-3.4).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.6–106.8), recent form (3.3–2.2), shooting efficiency (49.1–48.9).