Tulane

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.9%Tulane

71.1%Memphis

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMemphis -6.9

PROJECTED TOTAL151.8

MODEL MONEYLINEMemphis -246

Memphis

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTulane 72

Projected Total151.8

Projected ScoreMemphis 79

Team Comparison

TulaneMetricMemphis

44.3MMH Power Index47.8

105.3Offensive Efficiency104.6

109.9Defensive Efficiency106.5

-4.6Net Efficiency-1.9

2.7Strength of Schedule4.4

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.1

68.7Tempo71.9

49.6%Effective FG%48.7%

15.6%Turnover Rate18.9%

22.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

44.8%Free Throw Rate35.1%

-3.2Average Margin-1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Memphis HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMemphis holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–44.3), defensive efficiency (106.5–109.9), net efficiency (-1.9–-4.6), strength of schedule (4.4–2.7).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.3–104.6), recent form (-10.3–-11.1), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.7).

Final

Tulane

78—76

Memphis

Tulane by 2 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATMemphis

24-48FG20-56

50.0%FG%36.0%

10-243PT4-20

42.0%3PT%20.0%

20-26FT32-38

77.0%FT%84.0%

25Rebounds40

4Offensive Rebounds16

17Assists11

13Turnovers11

10Steals7

4Blocks4

28Fouls21

Player Box Score

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	40	8-13	3-7	8-10	3	2	1	0	27
Asher Woods	G	40	5-10	4-5	5-6	6	5	1	0	19
Tyler Ringgold	F	28	4-10	0-4	4-7	3	1	4	0	12
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	31	2-7	1-4	2-2	7	0	2	0	7
Scotty Middleton	F	16	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	3	0	0	6
Percy Daniels	C	18	2-2	0-0	1-1	2	3	0	1	5
Josiah Moore	G	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	1	2
Luke Rasmussen	G	16	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	2	0

Memphis

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dug McDaniel	G	38	6-14	1-5	0-0	2	4	4	0	13
Julius Thedford	G	28	3-8	0-1	6-8	5	0	1	1	12
Aaron Bradshaw	F	26	3-6	0-1	6-6	9	2	1	1	12
Quante Berry	G	25	3-9	1-5	4-4	4	2	0	0	11
Zach Davis	G	22	3-6	1-3	2-2	5	0	0	1	9
Sincere Parker	G	19	1-8	1-3	6-6	4	1	0	0	9
Simon Majok	C	14	0-1	0-0	4-6	7	0	0	0	4
Tariq Ingraham	F	10	0-0	0-0	4-6	1	0	0	0	4
Ashton Hardaway	F	18	1-4	0-2	0-0	3	2	1	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3

112.6Offensive Efficiency109.7

109.7Defensive Efficiency112.6

2.9Net Efficiency-2.9

60.4%Effective FG%39.3%

64.6%True Shooting %51.3%

18.7%Turnover Rate15.9%

54.2%Free Throw Rate67.9%

50.0%3-Point Rate35.7%

1.31Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Tulane won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.