Houston Christian

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.9%Houston Christian

91.1%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -15.8

PROJECTED TOTAL142.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -1024

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHouston Christian 63

Projected Total142.4

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 79

Team Comparison

Houston ChristianMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

39.5MMH Power Index55.8

102.5Offensive Efficiency112.6

110.3Defensive Efficiency103.1

-7.8Net Efficiency9.5

-0.6Strength of Schedule-1.9

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

65.4Tempo67.4

49.9%Effective FG%55.7%

19.0%Turnover Rate17.9%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

37.1%Free Throw Rate29.6%

-5.1Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–39.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.5), defensive efficiency (103.1–110.3), net efficiency (9.5–-7.8).

Houston Christian COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.6–-1.9), offensive rebounding (30.5–29.2), free throw rate (37.1–29.6).

Final

Houston Christian

57—74

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 17 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Houston ChristianTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

20-60FG24-55

33.0%FG%44.0%

7-253PT9-24

28.0%3PT%38.0%

10-13FT17-18

77.0%FT%94.0%

29Rebounds44

12Offensive Rebounds15

15Assists22

7Turnovers14

7Steals3

8Blocks5

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Houston Christian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Demari Williams	G	33	6-12	1-4	5-5	3	3	0	0	18
Ryan Bartley	G	30	4-9	3-5	1-2	1	1	1	0	12
D'Aundre Samuels	G	33	3-8	1-4	3-4	6	1	2	2	10
Demarco Bethea	F	28	3-10	0-1	1-2	2	2	1	2	7
Kylin Green	G	27	2-12	1-5	0-0	3	4	0	0	5
Trent Johnson	F	26	2-6	1-5	0-0	2	3	3	2	5
Mambourou Mara	F	14	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	2	0
Ahjany Lee	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Caleb Gaston	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Filip Brankovic	F	22	6-9	1-2	4-5	5	2	0	0	17
Koree Cotton	G	29	4-11	2-6	2-2	6	3	0	2	12
Julien Gomez	G	26	3-8	2-5	4-4	6	3	0	0	12
Marvin McGhee III	G	34	3-10	2-5	3-3	3	1	1	0	11
Jaylen Washington	G	34	3-5	0-0	4-4	4	6	1	1	10
Zae Blake	G	16	2-4	2-3	0-0	5	2	1	0	6
Kwo Agwa	F	15	2-3	0-0	0-0	6	2	0	1	4
Marshal Destremau	F	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Jalen Ricks	G	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Dane Christensen	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Always Wright	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Demarris Winters	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9

92.1Offensive Efficiency119.5

119.5Defensive Efficiency92.1

-27.5Net Efficiency27.5

39.2%Effective FG%51.8%

43.1%True Shooting %58.2%

11.4%Turnover Rate22.4%

21.7%Free Throw Rate32.7%

41.7%3-Point Rate43.6%

2.14Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.