
Kent State
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.6%Kent State
72.4%Toledo
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADToledo -6.2
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEToledo -262

Toledo
19-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 80
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreToledo 86
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index58.8
113.9Offensive Efficiency116.0
107.6Defensive Efficiency109.6
6.3Net Efficiency6.4
-0.1Strength of Schedule2.3
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency10.2
74.0Tempo69.8
53.0%Effective FG%55.1%
17.7%Turnover Rate14.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
43.5%Free Throw Rate30.3%
4.7Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Toledo HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMToledo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–54.7), offensive efficiency (116.0–113.9), net efficiency (6.4–6.3), strength of schedule (2.3–-0.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–109.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.4), free throw rate (43.5–30.3).