Duquesne

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.3%Duquesne

76.7%George Mason

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGeorge Mason -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.7

MODEL MONEYLINEGeorge Mason -329

George Mason

23-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDuquesne 70

Projected Total148.7

Projected ScoreGeorge Mason 78

Team Comparison

DuquesneMetricGeorge Mason

50.7MMH Power Index56.8

110.6Offensive Efficiency112.9

106.2Defensive Efficiency104.5

4.4Net Efficiency8.4

0.6Strength of Schedule2.8

-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.0

70.8Tempo64.9

53.4%Effective FG%53.4%

17.7%Turnover Rate16.3%

30.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

38.2%Free Throw Rate43.6%

3.1Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

George Mason HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorge Mason holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–50.7), offensive efficiency (112.9–110.6), defensive efficiency (104.5–106.2), net efficiency (8.4–4.4).

Final

Duquesne

71—65

George Mason

Duquesne by 6 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DuquesneTEAM STATGeorge Mason

24-54FG25-51

44.0%FG%49.0%

7-213PT7-18

33.0%3PT%39.0%

16-21FT8-15

76.0%FT%53.0%

31Rebounds30

10Offensive Rebounds9

8Assists13

9Turnovers17

13Steals2

2Blocks3

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Alex Williams	F	26	7-12	2-5	9-10	4	0	2	0	25
Jimmie Williams	G	37	3-12	1-5	6-7	5	3	2	0	13
David Dixon	F	31	6-8	0-0	1-4	7	0	2	2	13
Jake DiMichele	G	26	3-6	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	7
Brandon Hall	G	37	2-9	2-5	0-0	4	2	5	0	6
Cam Crawford	G	28	2-5	1-2	0-0	1	1	2	0	5
John Hugley IV	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Stef van Bussel	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Dom Aekins	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

George Mason

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Riley Allenspach	F	23	8-12	1-1	1-4	7	1	1	0	18
Jahari Long	G	39	6-12	2-6	3-3	3	3	0	0	17
Kory Mincy	G	36	3-7	2-4	2-2	2	3	1	0	10
Emmanuel Kanga	F	15	3-4	0-0	1-4	6	1	0	2	7
Stas Sivka	F	21	2-2	2-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	6
Fatt Hill	G	29	2-7	0-2	0-0	2	3	0	0	4
Masai Troutman	G	21	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Nick Ellington	F	6	0-0	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Malik Presley	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Devin Booker	G	4	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6

109.9Offensive Efficiency100.6

100.6Defensive Efficiency109.9

9.3Net Efficiency-9.3

50.9%Effective FG%55.9%

55.5%True Shooting %55.9%

14.3%Turnover Rate25.7%

38.9%Free Throw Rate29.4%

38.9%3-Point Rate35.3%

0.89Assist / Turnover0.76

Game Summary

Duquesne won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.