
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
72.3%Tulsa
27.7%Florida Atlantic
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL159.3
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -261

Florida Atlantic
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 82
Projected Total159.3
Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 77
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index51.6
121.1Offensive Efficiency110.5
104.8Defensive Efficiency104.4
16.3Net Efficiency6.1
0.0Strength of Schedule-0.9
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.6
70.2Tempo71.2
55.4%Effective FG%52.5%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %32.9%
42.4%Free Throw Rate33.9%
11.5Average Margin4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–51.6), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.5), net efficiency (16.3–6.1), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.9).
Florida Atlantic COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.4–104.8).