
Army
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%Army
86.4%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -635

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArmy 70
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreColgate 82
Team Comparison
36.8MMH Power Index48.8
104.8Offensive Efficiency111.7
112.1Defensive Efficiency109.0
-7.3Net Efficiency2.7
-3.3Strength of Schedule-2.0
-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
68.9Tempo68.4
49.8%Effective FG%54.5%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.8%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
26.5%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-5.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–36.8), offensive efficiency (111.7–104.8), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.1), net efficiency (2.7–-7.3).
Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–26.9).