
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.4%Longwood
14.6%Gardner-Webb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLongwood -12.3
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -585

Gardner-Webb
4-29MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 84
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 72
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index26.6
108.1Offensive Efficiency96.0
103.0Defensive Efficiency120.4
5.1Net Efficiency-24.4
-6.4Strength of Schedule3.3
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-18.2
71.9Tempo71.0
51.4%Effective FG%48.8%
19.3%Turnover Rate19.2%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %23.6%
42.0%Free Throw Rate31.5%
3.6Average Margin-17.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–26.6), offensive efficiency (108.1–96.0), defensive efficiency (103.0–120.4), net efficiency (5.1–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-6.4), ball security (19.2–19.3).