
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.0%UTEP
86.0%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -614

Sam Houston
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 69
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreSam Houston 82
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index56.1
102.6Offensive Efficiency115.5
107.1Defensive Efficiency105.5
-4.5Net Efficiency10.0
1.7Strength of Schedule-2.2
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
67.6Tempo71.2
49.2%Effective FG%53.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.6%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
35.6%Free Throw Rate34.8%
-3.1Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.1), net efficiency (10.0–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.2), free throw rate (35.6–34.8).