UTEP logo

UTEP

11-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.0%UTEP
86.0%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -614
Sam Houston logo

Sam Houston

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 69
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreSam Houston 82

Team Comparison

44.4MMH Power Index56.1
102.6Offensive Efficiency115.5
107.1Defensive Efficiency105.5
-4.5Net Efficiency10.0
1.7Strength of Schedule-2.2
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
67.6Tempo71.2
49.2%Effective FG%53.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.6%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
35.6%Free Throw Rate34.8%
-3.1Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.1), net efficiency (10.0–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.2), free throw rate (35.6–34.8).
Final
UTEP logo
UTEP
6670
Sam Houston logo
Sam Houston
Sam Houston by 469.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTEPTEAM STATSam Houston
26-65FG21-61
40.0%FG%34.0%
4-223PT7-23
18.0%3PT%30.0%
10-14FT21-27
71.0%FT%78.0%
37Rebounds50
8Offensive Rebounds16
7Assists14
6Turnovers12
4Steals4
3Blocks1
19Fouls13

Player Box Score

UTEP
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Caleb BlackwellG358-173-83-453000022
Jamal West Jr.F358-150-25-860020021
Kaseem WatsonF356-151-50-070100013
KJ ThomasG262-40-00-04120004
Elijah JonesF231-50-22-27000004
Cassius BrooksG171-50-20-03200002
Trey Horton IIIG170-10-10-00000000
Mouhamed MbayeC80-10-00-02011000
LA HayesG40-20-20-01100000
Sam Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Po'Boigh KingG363-172-109-1075100017
Damon Nicholas Jr.G346-122-40-061200014
Justin BeggG223-53-40-01001009
Veljko IlicF244-70-00-34200008
Kashie NattG240-50-38-812400008
Matt DannF143-30-01-27010007
Jacobe ColemanG182-50-21-26000005
Jacob WalkerG260-50-02-24200002
CJ BeaumontG20-20-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8
94.6Offensive Efficiency100.3
100.3Defensive Efficiency94.6
-5.7Net Efficiency5.7
43.1%Effective FG%40.2%
46.1%True Shooting %47.4%
8.6%Turnover Rate17.2%
21.5%Free Throw Rate44.3%
33.8%3-Point Rate37.7%
1.17Assist / Turnover1.17
Game Summary
Sam Houston won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.