
Lipscomb
18-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.8%Lipscomb
78.2%Austin Peay
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -9.2
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -359

Austin Peay
22-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 73
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreAustin Peay 82
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index54.8
111.3Offensive Efficiency115.0
107.6Defensive Efficiency103.1
3.7Net Efficiency11.9
-2.5Strength of Schedule-5.8
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency8.1
68.8Tempo71.0
54.8%Effective FG%53.9%
16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
26.5%Free Throw Rate39.0%
2.5Average Margin8.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (115.0–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.6), net efficiency (11.9–3.7).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-5.8), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.9).