Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.4%Clemson

60.6%Stanford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStanford -2.6

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -154

Stanford

20-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 70

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreStanford 73

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricStanford

59.9MMH Power Index59.2

112.6Offensive Efficiency111.6

101.4Defensive Efficiency107.1

11.2Net Efficiency4.5

4.6Strength of Schedule5.2

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4

63.6Tempo68.1

53.0%Effective FG%51.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.5%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

38.1%Free Throw Rate37.2%

7.2Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–59.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.6), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.1), net efficiency (11.2–4.5).

Stanford COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–4.6), recent form (7.4–-4.7), offensive rebounding (32.4–27.0).

Final

Clemson

66—64

Stanford

Clemson by 2 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATStanford

21-46FG24-60

46.0%FG%40.0%

7-173PT9-28

41.0%3PT%32.0%

17-22FT7-9

77.0%FT%78.0%

34Rebounds30

6Offensive Rebounds10

8Assists12

12Turnovers7

3Steals10

1Blocks3

14Fouls20

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nick Davidson	F	30	5-6	2-2	4-5	7	0	0	1	16
Ace Buckner	G	21	3-6	1-2	4-4	3	2	0	0	11
Chase Thompson	F	18	4-5	1-1	1-1	3	1	0	0	10
RJ Godfrey	F	12	3-4	0-0	3-6	1	0	0	0	9
Jestin Porter	G	35	2-10	2-5	2-2	4	0	0	0	8
Carter Welling	F	19	2-5	0-1	0-0	8	1	2	0	4
Butta Johnson	G	21	0-2	0-2	3-4	1	0	0	0	3
Dallas Thomas	F	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Dillon Hunter	G	27	1-4	0-1	0-0	5	4	0	0	2
Jake Wahlin	F	14	0-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Stanford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aidan Cammann	F	32	7-12	2-5	3-3	5	2	2	2	19
Ebuka Okorie	G	37	6-11	2-3	4-4	1	3	2	0	18
Oskar Giltay	F	23	4-4	0-0	0-1	11	0	2	1	8
Benny Gealer	G	25	2-8	2-7	0-0	2	1	1	0	6
Ryan Agarwal	G	21	2-8	2-6	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Jeremy Dent-Smith	G	27	2-10	1-4	0-1	1	3	2	0	5
Jaylen Thompson	F	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
AJ Rohosy	F	17	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Donavin Young	F	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9

106.6Offensive Efficiency103.4

103.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

3.2Net Efficiency-3.2

53.3%Effective FG%47.5%

58.5%True Shooting %49.8%

19.2%Turnover Rate11.4%

47.8%Free Throw Rate15.0%

37.0%3-Point Rate46.7%

0.67Assist / Turnover1.71

Game Summary

Clemson won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.