Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.0%Binghamton
97.0%UMBC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -22.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -3233
UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 58
Projected Total137.4
Projected ScoreUMBC 80

Team Comparison

32.4MMH Power Index59.1
102.2Offensive Efficiency113.0
112.3Defensive Efficiency99.0
-10.1Net Efficiency14.0
-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.6
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7
64.2Tempo65.5
51.3%Effective FG%54.3%
18.5%Turnover Rate14.3%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %25.2%
42.8%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-6.5Average Margin9.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (113.0–102.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.3), net efficiency (14.0–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–34.1).
Final
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
6279
UMBC logo
UMBC
UMBC by 1766.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATUMBC
21-52FG28-64
40.0%FG%44.0%
5-203PT9-26
25.0%3PT%35.0%
15-18FT14-19
83.0%FT%74.0%
32Rebounds40
2Offensive Rebounds10
9Assists14
8Turnovers3
3Steals4
2Blocks1
13Fouls10

Player Box Score

Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jeremiah QuigleyG409-130-22-2115100020
Bryson WilsonG394-111-49-1120010018
Jackson BenigniG334-83-63-351000014
Stephan SnaggF403-60-01-27101007
Wes Peterson Jr.G401-101-40-05220003
Nevin IbrociG70-30-30-01000000
Ryan RichardsonG10-10-10-01000000
UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
DJ Armstrong Jr.G336-125-110-030000017
Josh OdunowoF276-110-03-482010015
Jah'Likai KingG365-142-71-212200013
Ace ValentineG353-51-35-624000012
Jose Roberto TanchynF264-110-22-2111000010
Caden DiggsF182-40-03-48310007
Cougar DowningG81-41-30-01210003
Daylon DickersonF81-30-00-12000002
Riley JacobsF90-00-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3
93.5Offensive Efficiency119.2
119.2Defensive Efficiency93.5
-25.6Net Efficiency25.6
45.2%Effective FG%50.8%
51.2%True Shooting %54.1%
12.0%Turnover Rate4.5%
34.6%Free Throw Rate29.7%
38.5%3-Point Rate40.6%
1.13Assist / Turnover4.67
Game Summary
UMBC won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.