
Canisius
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.2%Canisius
91.8%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -16.0
PROJECTED TOTAL139.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1120

Quinnipiac
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCanisius 62
Projected Total139.9
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78
Team Comparison
33.9MMH Power Index51
97.1Offensive Efficiency106.8
108.8Defensive Efficiency102.1
-11.7Net Efficiency4.7
-1.8Strength of Schedule-2.3
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
64.8Tempo70.5
46.8%Effective FG%48.9%
19.6%Turnover Rate15.6%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %34.1%
32.4%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-7.5Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.8), net efficiency (4.7–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-2.3).