
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.5%Stonehill
63.5%Fairleigh Dickinson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairleigh Dickinson -3.9
PROJECTED TOTAL134.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFairleigh Dickinson -174

Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 65
Projected Total134.9
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 69
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index38.3
97.5Offensive Efficiency103.8
100.7Defensive Efficiency108.4
-3.2Net Efficiency-4.6
-5.4Strength of Schedule-5.8
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
68.1Tempo64.7
48.0%Effective FG%48.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.2%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
29.2%Free Throw Rate33.1%
-2.2Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairleigh Dickinson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairleigh Dickinson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.3–37.9), offensive efficiency (103.8–97.5), shooting efficiency (48.6–48.0), ball security (18.2–19.1).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–108.4), net efficiency (-3.2–-4.6), strength of schedule (-5.4–-5.8).