
Northeastern
8-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.2%Northeastern
92.8%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -17.7
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -1289

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNortheastern 66
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreHofstra 84
Team Comparison
40.9MMH Power Index59.3
107.1Offensive Efficiency114.0
115.7Defensive Efficiency100.9
-8.6Net Efficiency13.1
2.7Strength of Schedule-2.9
-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
69.9Tempo66.2
52.7%Effective FG%52.2%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
29.9%Free Throw Rate32.0%
-6.0Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–40.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–107.1), defensive efficiency (100.9–115.7), net efficiency (13.1–-8.6).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.7–52.2).