
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%Drexel
73.5%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCampbell -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL146.8
MODEL MONEYLINECampbell -277

Campbell
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 70
Projected Total146.8
Projected ScoreCampbell 76
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index51.1
103.6Offensive Efficiency110.9
102.4Defensive Efficiency111.0
1.2Net Efficiency-0.1
-0.4Strength of Schedule0.8
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
65.7Tempo70.6
51.3%Effective FG%51.3%
19.1%Turnover Rate17.4%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
32.3%Free Throw Rate44.2%
0.8Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Campbell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCampbell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.1–46.5), offensive efficiency (110.9–103.6), strength of schedule (0.8–-0.4), recent form (2.9–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–111.0), net efficiency (1.2–-0.1), average scoring margin (0.8–0.0).