
Stetson
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.8%Stetson
74.2%Bellarmine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBellarmine -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINEBellarmine -288

Bellarmine
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 77
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreBellarmine 84
Team Comparison
40MMH Power Index44.9
107.2Offensive Efficiency119.6
115.9Defensive Efficiency122.1
-8.7Net Efficiency-2.5
-1.0Strength of Schedule-2.8
-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3
68.7Tempo66.9
53.8%Effective FG%60.0%
18.3%Turnover Rate15.3%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %22.7%
33.6%Free Throw Rate35.3%
-6.0Average Margin-1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bellarmine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBellarmine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.9–40.0), offensive efficiency (119.6–107.2), net efficiency (-2.5–-8.7), recent form (0.3–-2.9).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.9–122.1), strength of schedule (-1.0–-2.8), offensive rebounding (28.1–22.7).