
Jacksonville
12-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.6%Jacksonville
80.4%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL160.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -410

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreJacksonville 76
Projected Total160.9
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Team Comparison
43.6MMH Power Index51.7
109.8Offensive Efficiency118.4
110.3Defensive Efficiency117.0
-0.5Net Efficiency1.4
-4.8Strength of Schedule0.1
-3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
66.6Tempo71.4
51.7%Effective FG%56.6%
16.9%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
33.9%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-0.3Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–43.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–109.8), net efficiency (1.4–-0.5), strength of schedule (0.1–-4.8).
Jacksonville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.3–117.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–29.6).