
George Washington
19-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.4%George Washington
37.6%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorge Washington -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.6
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorge Washington -166

Duquesne
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorge Washington 80
Projected Total157.6
Projected ScoreDuquesne 78
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index50.7
115.4Offensive Efficiency110.6
105.2Defensive Efficiency106.2
10.2Net Efficiency4.4
3.1Strength of Schedule0.6
0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
70.5Tempo70.8
55.0%Effective FG%53.4%
18.2%Turnover Rate17.7%
35.8%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
35.6%Free Throw Rate38.2%
7.2Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
George Washington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorge Washington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–50.7), offensive efficiency (115.4–110.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (10.2–4.4).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHball security (17.7–18.2), free throw rate (38.2–35.6).