Kansas State logo

Kansas State

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%Kansas State
87.1%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -13.0
PROJECTED TOTAL158.7
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -675
TCU logo

TCU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKansas State 73
Projected Total158.7
Projected ScoreTCU 86

Team Comparison

47.1MMH Power Index59.7
107.8Offensive Efficiency110.2
110.9Defensive Efficiency102.7
-3.1Net Efficiency7.5
5.5Strength of Schedule4.6
-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
73.8Tempo70.2
53.5%Effective FG%50.5%
17.4%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
27.4%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-2.3Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

TCU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–47.1), offensive efficiency (110.2–107.8), defensive efficiency (102.7–110.9), net efficiency (7.5–-3.1).
Kansas State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), shooting efficiency (53.5–50.5).
Final
Kansas State logo
Kansas State
8284
TCU logo
TCU
TCU by 271.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kansas StateTEAM STATTCU
33-63FG27-59
52.0%FG%46.0%
11-263PT8-26
42.0%3PT%31.0%
5-8FT22-36
63.0%FT%61.0%
25Rebounds40
8Offensive Rebounds17
24Assists18
12Turnovers13
8Steals7
5Blocks
23Fouls10

Player Box Score

Kansas State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
P.J. HaggertyG3914-242-50-111100030
Marcus JohnsonF195-65-60-033000015
Nate JohnsonG375-111-62-3411620013
David CastilloG403-103-82-202100011
Khamari McGriffF243-40-00-02403006
Taj ManningF232-40-00-06200004
C.J. JonesG141-30-10-01100002
Dorin BucaC40-10-01-22000001
TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Xavier EdmondsF309-101-17-13100200026
Micah RobinsonF265-122-64-762000016
David PunchF304-100-26-863200014
Jayden PierreG373-80-34-414200010
Brock HardingG293-63-60-03610009
Tanner ToolsonG242-71-41-45200006
Liutauras LeleviciusG171-31-30-02100003
Jace PoseyG50-30-10-01000000
Vianney SalatchoumC20-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4
114.8Offensive Efficiency117.6
117.6Defensive Efficiency114.8
-2.8Net Efficiency2.8
61.1%Effective FG%52.5%
61.4%True Shooting %55.2%
16.9%Turnover Rate18.0%
12.7%Free Throw Rate61.0%
41.3%3-Point Rate44.1%
2.00Assist / Turnover1.38
Game Summary
TCU won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.