
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.7%Longwood
82.3%Winthrop
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWinthrop -10.5
PROJECTED TOTAL158.8
MODEL MONEYLINEWinthrop -465

Winthrop
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 74
Projected Total158.8
Projected ScoreWinthrop 85
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index56.2
108.1Offensive Efficiency115.6
103.0Defensive Efficiency104.3
5.1Net Efficiency11.3
-6.4Strength of Schedule-3.6
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.8
71.9Tempo72.4
51.4%Effective FG%51.2%
19.3%Turnover Rate15.0%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %35.5%
42.0%Free Throw Rate44.4%
3.6Average Margin8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Winthrop HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWinthrop holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.2–47.0), offensive efficiency (115.6–108.1), net efficiency (11.3–5.1), strength of schedule (-3.6–-6.4).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–104.3), shooting efficiency (51.4–51.2).