Niagara

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.0%Niagara

90.0%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -15.0

PROJECTED TOTAL141.2

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -900

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNiagara 63

Projected Total141.2

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78

Team Comparison

NiagaraMetricQuinnipiac

35.8MMH Power Index51

100.8Offensive Efficiency106.8

112.4Defensive Efficiency102.1

-11.6Net Efficiency4.7

-0.8Strength of Schedule-2.3

-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

63.4Tempo70.5

50.9%Effective FG%48.9%

18.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

24.9%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

27.3%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-7.4Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–35.8), offensive efficiency (106.8–100.8), defensive efficiency (102.1–112.4), net efficiency (4.7–-11.6).

Niagara COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.8–-2.3), shooting efficiency (50.9–48.9).

Final

Niagara

55—56

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 1 • 59.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NiagaraTEAM STATQuinnipiac

20-49FG18-60

41.0%FG%30.0%

8-253PT8-22

32.0%3PT%36.0%

7-10FT12-16

70.0%FT%75.0%

37Rebounds39

11Offensive Rebounds19

13Assists13

15Turnovers12

8Steals8

4Blocks2

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

Niagara

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Shortt	F	31	7-11	0-0	0-0	11	1	1	3	14
Landon Williams	G	32	3-7	3-6	1-2	3	2	2	1	10
Vice Zanki	F	30	3-9	2-7	1-2	5	0	1	0	9
Justin Hawkins	F	24	2-7	0-2	5-6	5	3	0	0	9
Drew Larson	F	14	3-4	2-3	0-0	5	1	0	0	8
Brian Griffith	G	5	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Reggie Prudhomme	G	27	0-3	0-3	0-0	4	3	1	0	0
Trenton Walters	G	23	0-5	0-3	0-0	1	3	3	0	0
Josiah Sabino	G	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kabeya Tshibangu	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	39	4-15	3-7	4-4	11	3	3	1	15
Keith McKnight	G	29	4-11	0-0	3-5	7	1	1	1	11
Grant Randall	F	35	3-10	2-6	2-2	8	0	2	0	10
Jaden Zimmerman	G	24	3-12	2-7	1-2	1	3	0	0	9
Asim Jones	G	30	2-5	1-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	5
Braylan Ritvo	F	13	2-5	0-0	0-1	1	0	1	0	4
Nate Guerengomba	G	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	1	0	2
Tai Turnage	G	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	3	0	0	0
Spence Wewe	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Samson Reilly	G	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.2Possessions59.2

92.9Offensive Efficiency94.6

94.6Defensive Efficiency92.9

-1.7Net Efficiency1.7

49.0%Effective FG%36.7%

51.2%True Shooting %41.4%

26.0%Turnover Rate19.8%

20.4%Free Throw Rate26.7%

51.0%3-Point Rate36.7%

0.87Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 59.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.