
Oklahoma
21-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.0%Oklahoma
78.0%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL165.1
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -355

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 78
Projected Total165.1
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87
Team Comparison
62.1MMH Power Index68.9
119.5Offensive Efficiency120.9
111.6Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.9Net Efficiency15.2
3.2Strength of Schedule7.4
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.4Tempo70.9
55.1%Effective FG%55.3%
14.4%Turnover Rate13.5%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
36.2%Free Throw Rate39.3%
5.5Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–62.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–119.5), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.6), net efficiency (15.2–7.9).
Oklahoma COUNTERS WITHrecent form (12.3–2.7), offensive rebounding (32.4–30.8).