
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.0%DePaul
76.0%Providence
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADProvidence -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.2
MODEL MONEYLINEProvidence -317

Providence
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 75
Projected Total157.2
Projected ScoreProvidence 82
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index54.2
103.7Offensive Efficiency115.0
102.7Defensive Efficiency113.2
1.0Net Efficiency1.8
2.0Strength of Schedule4.0
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
67.7Tempo74.2
49.9%Effective FG%55.0%
17.8%Turnover Rate16.7%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.8%Free Throw Rate37.3%
0.7Average Margin1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Providence HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMProvidence holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.2–48.4), offensive efficiency (115.0–103.7), net efficiency (1.8–1.0), strength of schedule (4.0–2.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–113.2).